Sources: Almost meets required number of sources. Sources are varied and academically appropriate. (missing 1)
Formatting: Conveys required information, but with a substantial number of formatting errors.
* Does not follow MLA formatting. * Hyperlink the url for neater presentation. * Watch typos / errors on non-database sources. * Entries need to be in alphabetical order.
Annotations: Partially completes 2 of the following 3: 1) summarizes source, 2) explains relationship to project, 3) is free of mechanical/grammar errors.
* Far too many grammatical errors. * Otherwise some nice thoughts here--you would have scored much higher if all the formatting and editing were done.
Sources: Almost meets required number of sources. Sources are varied and academically appropriate. (missing 1)
ReplyDeleteFormatting: Conveys required information, but with a substantial number of formatting errors.
* Does not follow MLA formatting.
* Hyperlink the url for neater presentation.
* Watch typos / errors on non-database sources.
* Entries need to be in alphabetical order.
Annotations: Partially completes 2 of the following 3: 1) summarizes source, 2) explains relationship to project, 3) is free of mechanical/grammar errors.
* Far too many grammatical errors.
* Otherwise some nice thoughts here--you would have scored much higher if all the formatting and editing were done.